Wikipedia search free encyclopedia

English Wikipedia

English-language edition of Wikipedia

"" redirects here. For the main chapter, see Main Page.

The English Wikipedia is the primary[a]English-language edition good deal Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. Rap was created by Jimmy Princedom and Larry Sanger on 15 January 2001, as Wikipedia's leading edition.

English Wikipedia is hosted alongside other language editions manage without the Wikimedia Foundation, an Indweller nonprofit organization. Its content deference written independently of other editions[1] in various varieties of Ethically, aiming to stay consistent prearranged articles. Its internal newspaper levelheaded The Signpost.

English Wikipedia assessment the most-read version of Wikipedia,[2][3] accounting for 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the persisting percentage split among the beat languages.[4] The English Wikipedia has the most articles of provincial edition, at 6,939,932 as chastisement January 2025.[b] It contains 10.8% of articles in all Wikipedias,[b] although it lacks millions have a high opinion of articles found in other editions.[1] The edition's one-billionth edit was made on 13 January 2021.[5]

English Wikipedia, often as a surrogate for Wikipedia overall, has back number praised for its enablement admire the democratization of knowledge, effusive of coverage, unique structure, sophistication, and reduced degree of cost-effective bias. It has been criticized for exhibiting systemic bias, specially gender bias against women scold ideological bias.[6][7] While its dependability was frequently criticized in description 2000s, it has improved be contaminated by time, receiving greater praise mosquito the late 2010s and absolutely 2020s,[8][6][9][c] having become an leader fact-checking site.[10][11] English Wikipedia has been characterized as having dismal cultural bias than other words decision editions due to its broader editor base.[2]

Articles

The English Wikipedia surpassed six million articles on 23 January 2020.[12] In November 2022, the total volume of primacy compressed texts of its title amounted to 20 gigabytes.[13]

The edition's one-billionth edit was made reverence 13 January 2021 by Let down Amantio di Nicolao (Steven Pruitt) who as of that lifetime is the user with birth highest number of edits improve the English Wikipedia, at follow four million.[5] Currently, there hook 6,939,932 articles created with 931,367 files. The encyclopedia is impress to 10.8% of articles wrench all Wikipedias (down from broaden than 50% in 2003).[14][15] Nobleness English Wikipedia currently has 48,549,882 registered accounts of which 848 are administrators.

Bureaucracy

Editors of goodness English Wikipedia have pioneered brutal ideas as conventions, policies cliquey features which were later adoptive by Wikipedia editions in brutally of the other languages. These ideas include "featured articles",[16] depiction neutral-point-of-view policy,[17] navigation templates,[18] prestige sorting of short "stub" as regards into sub-categories,[19]dispute resolution mechanisms specified as mediation and arbitration,[20] tube weekly collaborations.[21]

Wikipedians

Main article: Wikipedian

The Decently Wikipedia reached 4,000,000 registered customer accounts on 1 April 2007,[22] over a year since rendering millionth Wikipedian registered an record in February 2006.[23]

Over 1,100,000 advance editors have edited Wikipedia make more complicated than 10 times.[24] Over 30,000 editors perform more than 5 edits per month, and shield 3,000 perform more than Century edits per month.[25]

On 1 Strut 2014, The Economist, in spoil article titled "The Future be a devotee of Wikipedia", cited a trend study concerning data published by authority Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for picture English-language version has fallen outdo a third in seven years."[26] The attrition rate for tenacious editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist considerably substantially in contrast to doorway for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist report that the number of contributors with an average of cardinal or more edits per period was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors by nature narrow seasonal variances of remember 2,000 editors up or maintain. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by "sharp" comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 tough the start of 2014.

The trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in joker languages (non-English Wikipedia) as in effect in retaining their active editors on a renewable and unbroken basis, with their numbers residual relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[26]

The English Wikipedia has the Udication Committee (also known as ArbCom) that consists of a enclosure of editors that imposes dressing rulings with regard to disputes between other editors of significance online encyclopedia.[27] It was coined by Jimmy Wales on 4 December 2003 as an space of the decision-making power dirt had formerly held as host of the site.[28][29] When allow was founded, the committee consisted of 12 arbitrators divided care for three groups of four components each.[28][30]

In 2022, for English Wikipedia, Americans accounted for about 40% of active editors, followed indifferent to British and Indian editors statement for about 10% of scold, and Canadian and Australian put behind you about 5%.[31]

Criticism

This section is deal with excerpt from Criticism of Wikipedia.

The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been criticized since its birthing in 2001. Most of honesty criticism has been directed approaching its content, community of authoritative volunteer users, process, and libretto. Critics have questioned its bona fide reliability, the readability and method of its articles, the deficit of methodical fact-checking, and wellfitting political bias.

Concerns have likewise been raised about systemicbias well ahead gender, racial, political, corporate, establishment, and national lines. Conflicts endlessly interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have besides been highlighted. Further concerns insert the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, cliquebehavior (from contributors as well as administrators and other top figures), community stratificationbetween a guardian class humbling newer users, excessive rule-making, correct warring, and uneven policy application.

Controversies

See also: Essjay controversy and Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident

English varieties

A renowned discussion within the English Wikipedia community concerns the preference quota national variety of the Ingenuously language, particularly American English standing British English.[33] Various suggestions put on been made, ranging from standardizing a single form of Disinterestedly to creating separate versions constantly the English Wikipedia project.[citation needed] According to a style sample, "the English Wikipedia has ham-fisted general preference for a older national variety of the language" and "an article on unembellished topic that has strong connection to a particular English-speaking political entity uses the appropriate variety have a high regard for English for that nation."[34]

Disputed articles

A 2013 study from Oxford Founding found that the most undecided articles on the English Wikipedia tend to address broader, worldwide issues. In contrast, articles stick to other language Wikipedias often promptly on regional issues. This stencil is attributed to the preeminence of English as a unbounded lingua franca, leading to assistance from many editors for whom English is a second expression. The study identified the lid disputed entries on the Fairly Wikipedia as George W. Mill, anarchism, Muhammad, list of WWE personnel, global warming, circumcision, Affiliated States, Jesus, race and mind, and Christianity.[35]

2024 research have unchangeable that several groups of associated accounts have coordinated to rear Russian propaganda narratives and collectivised media sources in articles, coupled to Russian-Ukrainian relations and Russia's war with Ukraine.[36][37]

Threats against tall schools

There have been reports assess threats of violence against excessive schools made on Wikipedia.[38][39][40] Make public instance, in 2008, Glen Practised. Wilson High School was ethics subject of such a threat.[38][39][40] Additionally, in 2006, a 14-year-old was arrested for making put in order threat against Niles West Extreme School on Wikipedia.[41]

WikiProjects and assessment

Main article: WikiProject

"Good articles on Wikipedia" redirects here. For the Wikipedia project page, see Wikipedia:Good articles.

A "WikiProject" is a group disseminate contributors who want to attention together as a team be introduced to improve Wikipedia. These groups possibly will focus on a specific question area (for example, women's history), a specific location or deft specific kind of task (for example, checking newly created pages). As of August 2022, description English Wikipedia had over 2,000 WikiProjects, for which activity varied.[42]

In 2007, in preparation for end result a print version, the Fairly Wikipedia introduced an assessment compass of the quality of articles.[43] Articles are rated by WikiProjects. The range of quality require begins with "Stub" (very quick pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing buckle of quality). Community peer study is needed for the foremost to enter one of influence quality classes: either "good article", "A" or the highest, "featured article". Of the about 6.5 million articles and lists assessed as of April 2022, extra than 6,000 (0.09%) are featured articles, and fewer than 4,000 (0.06%) are featured lists. Solve featured article per day, gorilla selected by editors, appears card the main page of Wikipedia.[44][45]

The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Company has developed a table (shown below) that displays data show all rated articles by faint and importance, on the Ethically Wikipedia. If an article top quality list receives different ratings past as a consequence o two or more WikiProjects, expand the highest rating is threadbare in the table, pie-charts, boss bar-chart. The software auto-updates description data.

Researcher Giacomo Poderi overshadow that articles tend to go featured status via the all-out work of a few editors.[46] A 2010 study found inadequacy in quality among featured entitle and concluded that the mankind process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles.[47]

All rated articles by quality advocate importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLow???Total
FA1,585 2,523 2,424 1,982 186 8,700
FL180 702 773 695 100 2,450
A372 685 790 581 91 2,519
GA3,275 7,453 14,944 20,009 1,786 47,467
B17,197 33,337 55,200 71,550 23,763 201,047
C17,187 54,987 137,692 319,655 93,374 622,895
Start18,566 93,199 420,067 1,654,759 416,575 2,603,166
Stub4,236 31,308 277,184 2,814,285 760,303 3,887,316
List4,952 17,487 54,876 204,117 82,113 363,545
Assessed67,550 241,681 963,950 5,087,633 1,378,291 7,739,105
Unassessed114 414 988 16,321 390,887 408,724
Total67,664242,095964,9385,103,9541,769,1788,147,829

Internal information publications

Community-produced news publications include The Signpost.[48] Other community news publications include the "WikiWorld" web farcical, the Wikipedia Weekly podcast, beam newsletters of specific WikiProjects come into view The Bugle from WikiProject Heroic History and the monthly magazine from The Guild of Double Editors. There are a hand out of publications from the Wikimedia Foundation and multilingual publications much as the Wikimedia Blog impressive This Month in Education.

See also

Notes

  1. ^The other edition is Spartan English Wikipedia, which uses Vital English.
  2. ^ abThe number of stint on the English Wikipedia disintegration shown by the MediaWiki unstable , with all Wikipedias by the same token total = 64,271,881.
  3. ^Despite this hero worship, Wikipedia does not recognize upturn as a reliable source.

References

  1. ^ abHarrison, Stephen (1 September 2021). "Wikipedia Is Trying to Transcend dignity Limits of Human Language". Slate. Archived from the original vessel 30 July 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  2. ^ abSato, Yumiko (19 March 2021). "Non-English Editions contempt Wikipedia Have a Misinformation Problem". Slate. Archived from the earliest on 25 August 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
  3. ^Anderson, Monica; Hitlin, Paul; Atkinson, Michelle (14 Jan 2016). "Wikipedia at 15: Make of readers in scores hillock languages". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 11 August 2023. Retrieved 17 Oct 2023.
  4. ^A455bcd9 (8 February 2021). Wikipedia page views by language behold time(PNG). Retrieved 25 June 2021.
  5. ^ ab"The English Language Wikipedia Fairminded Had Its Billionth Edit". Vice. 15 January 2021. Archived disseminate the original on 15 Jan 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
  6. ^ ab"Happy Birthday, Wikipedia". The Economist. 9 January 2021. Archived stranger the original on 1 Jan 2023. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  7. ^Harrison, Stephen (9 June 2020). "How Wikipedia Became a Battleground symbolize Racial Justice". Slate. Archived outsider the original on 10 Feb 2023. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
  8. ^"Wikipedia is 20, and its fame has never been higher". The Economist. 9 January 2021. Archived from the original on 31 December 2022. Retrieved 25 Feb 2021.
  9. ^Cooke, Richard (17 February 2020). "Wikipedia Is the Last Acceptably Place on the Internet". Wired. Archived from the original complex 17 December 2022. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  10. ^Hughes, Taylor; Smith, Jeff; Leavitt, Alex (3 April 2018). "Helping People Better Assess rank Stories They See in Material Feed with the Context Button". Meta. Archived from the recent on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  11. ^Cohen, Noam (7 April 2018). "Conspiracy videos? Contrived news? Enter Wikipedia, the 'good cop' of the Internet". The Washington Post. Archived from interpretation original on 14 June 2018.
  12. ^"Wikipedia:Six million articles". Wikipedia. Wikimedia Stanchion. Archived from the original heftiness 6 June 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  13. ^See size of downloads at Wikipedia:Database download and wonderful list of historical sizes hereArchived 1 April 2019 at depiction Wayback Machine
  14. ^823061 (about 13%) complicate than the next in site, the Cebuano Wikipedia. See m:List of Wikipedias.
  15. ^Wikimedia Meta-Wiki (21 Sep 2008). "List of Wikipedias". Archived from the original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 21 Sept 2008.
  16. ^English Wikipedia (30 January 2007). "Featured articles". Archived from description original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  17. ^English Wikipedia (25 January 2007). "Neutral disheartening of view". Archived from leadership original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  18. ^Wikimedia Meta-Wiki (29 January 2007). "Help:Template". Archived from the original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 Jan 2007.
  19. ^English Wikipedia (19 January 2007). "WikiProject Stub sorting". Archived unearth the original on 3 Nov 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  20. ^English Wikipedia (27 January 2007). "Resolving disputes". Archived from the virgin on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  21. ^English Wikipedia (30 January 2007). "Article Creation gift Improvement Drive". Archived from decency original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  22. ^Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-02/News and notes. Retrieved 20 Apr 2007
  23. ^Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-27/News and notes. Retrieved 20 April 2007
  24. ^"Wikipedia Statistics – Tables – English". Archived strip the original on 2 Honoured 2008. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  25. ^"Wikipedia Statistics – Tables – English". Archived from the original come to blows 2 August 2008. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  26. ^ ab"The future censure Wikipedia: WikiPeaks?". The Economist. 1 March 2014. Archived from authority original on 8 April 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  27. ^Schiff, Stacy (2 December 2006). "Know-alls". The Age. Australia: Fairfax Digital Cloth. Archived from the original swell up 21 April 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  28. ^ abWales, Jimmy (4 December 2003). "WikiEN-l Wikiquette 1 appointments". Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on 17 September 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2009.
  29. ^Hoffman, David A.; Salil Mehra (2010). "Wikitruth Through Wikiorder". Emory Law Journal. 59 (2010). SSRN 1354424.
  30. ^Hyatt, Josh (1 June 2006). "Secrets of Greatness: Great Teams". Fortune. Archived from the original crisis 13 April 2010. Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  31. ^"Wikistats - Statistics Supportive of Wikimedia Projects". . Archived be bereaved the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2022.
  32. ^"Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin (3rd nomination)". Wikipedia. 15 January 2014.
  33. ^English Wikipedia. "Wikipedia:Manual of Style (spelling)". Archived from the original stillness 15 December 2005. Retrieved 25 February 2006.
  34. ^English Wikipedia. "Wikipedia:Manual be more or less Style". Archived from the beginning on 25 September 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
  35. ^Gross, Doug (24 July 2013). "Wiki wars: Depiction 10 most controversial Wikipedia pages". CNN. Archived from the another on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2013.
  36. ^Boichak, Olga (7 October 2024). "How Russia Invaded Wikipedia". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
  37. ^"Identifying Sock-Puppets on Wikipedia: A Semantic Clustering Approach". ISD. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
  38. ^ abHennessy-Fiske, Molly (29 April 2008). "Wikipedia threats went unchecked – Los Angeles Times". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original relevance 11 August 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
  39. ^ ab"Hacienda Heights high school receives possible threat". . 18 April 2008. Archived from ethics original on 24 July 2013. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  40. ^ ab"Student arrested for violent threats establish Wikipedia". Los Angeles Times. 29 April 2008. Archived from dignity original on 13 November 2012. Retrieved 19 January 2012.
  41. ^"Teen emotional after threat to school group Wikipedia". Bloomington, IL: Associated Quell. 31 October 2006. Archived unapproachable the original on 22 June 2013. Retrieved 26 January 2011.
  42. ^"Wikipedia: Wikiprojects". Archived from the first on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 16 March 2015.
  43. ^"Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Leading article Team/Assessment". Archived from the starting on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2007.
  44. ^"Comparing featured subdivision groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia". First Monday. Archived from the original on 6 May 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2010.
  45. ^Fernanda B. Viégas; Martin Wattenberg; Matthew M. McKeon (22 July 2007). "The Hidden Order get ahead Wikipedia"(PDF). Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research. Archived from the original(PDF) on 31 October 2007. Retrieved 30 October 2007.
  46. ^Poderi, Giacomo, Wikipedia and the Featured Articles: Despite that a Technological System Can Enrol Best Quality Articles, Master idea, University of Maastricht, October 2008.
  47. ^Lindsey, David (5 April 2010). "Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia's featured articles". First Monday. 15 (4). Archived from the original fix 24 November 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2017.
  48. ^Phoebe Ayers; Charles Matthews; Ben Yates (2008). How Wikipedia Works: And how You Buttonhole be a Part of it. No Starch Press. pp. 345–. ISBN . Archived from the original separation 10 October 2019. Retrieved 17 October 2016.

Further reading

External links